A document is captured a single time.
Uploads route through one evidence service, then flow to every audit area they support. No re-uploading the same PDF into four tabs.
The system drafts the engagement. The auditor reviews, concludes, and signs — and every figure can show exactly where it came from.
Built with a practicing CPA reviewer · Designed for peer review
Click a number. The source document opens to the page — and the sentence it came from.
Uploads route through one evidence service, then flow to every audit area they support. No re-uploading the same PDF into four tabs.
If the system can't show where a number came from, it doesn't propose the number. Provenance isn't a feature here — it's a precondition.
When current-year evidence contradicts last year, the prior value is marked superseded — visible, dated, attributable. History is never rewritten.
Audit software remembers where a file lives. It doesn't remember why you concluded what you concluded — so the reasoning ends up in someone's head, and review becomes archaeology.
Every proposal arrives with the evidence it used and the prior-year baseline beside it. Accept, edit, or reject with a reason — the decision and the rationale both land in the file.
Uploads from anywhere in the engagement route through a single evidence service — classified, extracted, and triaged into buckets an auditor actually thinks in.
Expectations are built first, from prior year and the current trial balance. What doesn't match becomes the reason a risk exists — with the evidence attached to the proposal.
Grant revenue recognition and restriction compliance. Revenue rose +32.0% against an expectation of roughly +6% built from prior year and award schedules. Three new federal awards were signed mid-year with purpose restrictions.
A signoff binds to the exact content it approved. Change that content and the signature doesn't quietly carry — it's invalidated and surfaced for re-review.
The workpaper content changed after M. Lee signed it. The signature was bound to the version it approved, so it did not carry forward. Re-review required.
Everything the software records becomes part of the file. "Why did you conclude that?" and "show me the evidence" should already have answers sitting in the record.
An engagement stays on the methodology version it started on, so the reviewer sees exactly which rules governed the work. Mandatory updates can be pushed to in-flight engagements — and the push is logged.
Materiality, risk, scoping, and overrides record the why, the evidence used, and the prior-year baseline — not just the number that came out the other end.
Every action appends to a per-firm hash chain. Records can be added — they cannot be silently altered, backdated, or removed.
Workpapers, evidence, provenance, review notes, and signoff trails are built to export in a form a peer reviewer or successor auditor can actually read. No lock-in.
Security & data handling
AssureTrail is in private alpha, built alongside a practicing CPA reviewer. We're onboarding a small number of nonprofit audit practices.
AssureTrail is in private alpha. Tell us a little about your practice and we'll come back to you personally.